In a report, jointly produced by AXA, insurance lead in the Flourish driverless cars consortium, along with independent UK law firm Burges Salmon, it identifies the emerging issues relating to the evolution of Connected & Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) and makes recommendations pertaining to investment, data and cyber security that will contribute to the next stage of driverless vehicles development.
The transport sector is undergoing a period of unprecedented technological change, which has the potential to open up new opportunities for UK growth and improve accessibility to better meet the needs of the customer.
The Flourish consortium is looking at the development in user-centric autonomous vehicle technology and connected transport systems. The programme, co-funded by the UK’s innovation agency - Innovate UK, focuses on the core themes of connectivity, autonomy and customer interaction.
To access a full copy of the report, please click on the following link: www.flourishmobility.com/
In the report, AXA and Burges Salmon recommend the following measures:
Data
- The Government should consult on the implications of the General Data Protection Regulation for connected and autonomous vehicles and access to data for third parties, as this will play a crucial role in the development of the technology. In particular, the Government should look at how the system of data controllers and processors will work in the context of autonomous vehicles; whether the standards of consent are appropriate in this context; and what role encryption can and should play in relation to CAV data.
- The ICO should produce further guidance on whether CAV data falls into either data processes for public health purposes in the public interest or for archiving purposes in scientific research, in order to clarify the extent of the ‘right to be forgotten’ in this area.
- The Government should clarify its position on security services or other regulatory access to encrypted data, in order to allow for any need for security services or regulators to access CAV data to be taken into account during the development of the technology.
Consent
- The ICO should clarify what form of consent is required for use of ‘Special Categories’ under the GDPR, including whether or not an individual can provide consent on behalf of another individual.
- DCMS should work with stakeholders to establish necessary alternative legal bases to consent or permitted use for the processing of CAV data, for example where data is required to ensure the safety of CAVs.
Cyber Security
- The Government should also consult on cyber security issues raised by a connected transport ecosystem, to ensure that the unique risks are understood and the appropriate safeguards put in place when the technology is rolled out.
- The Government should clarify whether CAV operators will be designated as “operators of essential services” within the UK and therefore whether they are required to comply with the NIS Directive, including in the light of the Brexit negotiation outcome.
- The Government should clarify in other respects how it would intend to regulate the standards and operation of CAVs and CAV systems as they relate to data and data security so that they can be incorporated by design.
- Government and Industry should consider potential approaches to approvals and regulation of the supply chain including parts and maintenance organisations. This should draw on experience in equivalent industries and transport modes such as Rail (for example the approval of Entities in Charge of Maintenance) and Aviation (Maintenance Organisation Approvals and Production Organisation Approvals).
Investment
- The Government should continue to invest in the development of CAV technology, including through funding for creation of test facilities, and industry-led research and development projects.